![]() |
Book Notes Initial reactions to books,
|
|
![]() |
||
Back to Book Note Index Back to Books |
...without the
fixation of the
self and its salvation in the very center of all things, there is no
piety. Piety, in short, is the name we give to that great
virtue. Its opposite is the low esteem of the self and its
relegation to the unimportant periphery, out of which nothing good can
come. He who does not take himself seriously is soon lost,
but he
who thinks of himself as Abram did when he resolved that he, and in him
man, might serve only the highest, does, of course, behave
presumptuously. But this presumption will be a blessing to
many. For here is manifest the connection between the dignity
of
the self and the dignity of humanity. The claim of the human
ego
to central importance was the precondition for the discovery of God;
and only together, with the consequence of the utter destruction of a
humanity which does not take itself seriously, can both discoveries by
lost sight of again.( Joseph
the Provider, Ch. VII)
There is a delicious paradox here, of course, for while monastic life is, in one sense, a pursuit of humility, Mann is right in saying that it is also a life lived in confidence that humanity can and should touch the highest things. These men, though poor, are nevertheless conscious of being only a little lower than the angels. This magnanimity and hope of spiritual grandeur is today a rare thing in our culture, and the simple fact that the monasteries are there, silently but steadily teaching this good news, never fails to revive my flagging spirits -- and disturb my complacency. One of the finest aspects of this book is its thoughtful discussion of asceticism. Asceticism is another of those elements of monastic spirituality that so profoundly contradicts the spirit of our times that a particularly theatrical tradition -- in which the allegedly Catholic hatred of the body and of individual autonomy manifest themselves in maladjusted sexual repressives (formerly called 'chaste') and Pope-piloted zombies (formerly called 'the faithful') -- has arisen to discredit it. Louf ignores all of that, of course; he knows from experience the spirit of truly Christian asceticism. This spirit has been admirably stated by David Bentley Hart in a memorable essay: Christian asceticism
is not,
after all, a cruel disfigurement of the will, contaminated by the
world-weariness or malice towards creation that one can justly ascribe
to many other varieties of religious detachment. It is, rather, the
cultivation of the pure heart and pure eye, which allows one to receive
the world, and rejoice in it, not as a possession of the will or an
occasion for the exercise of power, but as the good gift of God. It is,
so to speak, a kind of “Marian” waiting upon the
Word of
God and its fruitfulness. This is why it has the power to heal us of
our modern derangements: because, paradoxical as it may seem to modern
temperaments, Christian asceticism is the practice of love, what
Maximus the Confessor calls learning to see the logos of each thing
within the Logos
of God, and it eventuates most properly in the grateful reverence of a
Bonaventure or the lyrical ecstasy of a Thomas Traherne.
Louf discusses a number of the central ascetic disciplines -- poverty, celibacy, obedience, fasting, vigils -- starting from the observation that each of them was practiced by Christ, and that therefore each should be seen as a means of growing into further conformity with the spirit of Christ. Thus the practice of poverty "is the first and radical break in that wall of personal desires which separates us from God and from each other"; celibacy creates in the monk an "affective void" which challenges him to seek ever more fervently the love of God and neighbour; obedience seeks to restrain the will, for, as was said by the Desert Fathers, "The will of man is a wall of brass between him and God"; fasting proclaims that man does not live by bread alone; and the silence which is perpetually preserved in the monastery is at the service of one of the central disciples of monastic life: interior vigilance. Louf writes: Within his heart the
monk is
always on guard. He does not sleep. He
watches. He is
attentive to the thoughts and temptations which prowl about his heart
inclining it to evil. He is attentive also to the least
movement
of grace which can signal God’s approach. Is it not
in the
beautiful silence of the night that according to the gospel we will
hear the cry announcing that the bridegroom is nigh?
‘Here
is the bridegroom. Come out to meet him.’ (Matthew
25:6)
It is a very fine book, and would serve as an admirable introduction to both the form and content, the inward spirit and the outward expression, of Western monasticism. [Thoughtful words about silence] Silence imposes itself on us inwardly in two ways. It issues from our poverty and it springs from our plenitude. Silence may sometimes be an expression of our poverty. This happens when we realize that we are not yet capable of speaking the word as we should. Jesus was very severe about the useless words a believer might speak thoughtlessly (Matthew 12:36)… But there is another kind of silence which springs from a fullness within us… A moment comes when silence alone can express the extraordinary richness of our heart. Such a silence unfolds a person gently and powerfully and always comes from within. Prayer governs it and teaches us when we should be silent and when we should speak. It is very pure praise and at the same time it radiates outward to others. Such silence never hurts anyone. It establishes a zone of peace and quiet around the one who is silent, where God can be irresistibly felt as present. ‘Keep your heart in peace’ says St. Seraphim of Sarov ‘and a multitude around you will be saved’. Back to Book Note Index Back to Books |